Professional … pragmatic … principled … progressive
Summary Minutes for
(approved September 15, 2005)
|
Executive
Board: Michael Harkins, President;
Paul Guymon, Vice President; Jim Edstrom, Secretary; Dan Loprieno, Treasurer;
Sue Overland, Grievance Officer; Julie Fleenor, Past President |
Actions
Taken
III. Officers’
Reports
·
Paul provided an
update on the College Assembly. He noted
that some faculty slots are still open.
·
Jim presented a
proposed schedule of Senate meetings for 2005-2006. They are as follows:
|
Fall
Semester 2005 |
Spring
Semester 2006 |
|
September 1 |
January 19 |
|
September 15 |
February 2 |
|
October 6 |
February 16 |
|
October 20 |
March 2 |
|
November 3 |
March 16 |
|
November 17 |
April 6 |
|
December 1 |
April 20 |
|
|
May 4 |
Dave
Braunschweig moved that the proposed schedule be accepted; Paul Guymon
seconded. The schedule was approved.
·
Sue provided a
brief update on grievances. She reminded
everyone of the importance of following proper tenure procedures. She also encouraged the contract committees
to keep the Senate apprised of issues that come up, given that the Senate has
the responsibility of approving changes in policies and procedures.
·
Dan reported that
faculty have been very generous in donating money to the amenities fund. He indicated that he would like to see more
faculty set up payroll deductions for Senate scholarships.
IV. Consent
Agenda
The
minutes from the Senate meeting of May 5th were distributed and
examined. Pat Beach moved that the
minutes be approved; Kathi Nevels seconded.
The minutes were approved.
V. Informational
Michael
announced that he would like to appoint Geoff Durian as Senator from TMS to
replace Dan Stanford, who resigned last December. Sue Overland so moved, and Paul Guymon
seconded. The motion was approved.
Michael
noted that the new Northwest Labor Group is now active. He asked that anyone with an interest in
attending meetings of this organization let him know.
Michael
again encouraged everyone to donate to COPE.
VI. Old
Business
The
scheduling grid was discussed. Jim
Edstrom reviewed Senate actions on the issue, specifically a motion passed on
VII. New
Business
The
role and function of chairs and coordinators was discussed. There is concern that their role is under
assault. As an example, recently in the
English Department there was an attempt by the Dean to add more sections of
English 101 as late-start courses against the advice of the co-chairs. (The Dean had previously agreed that there
would be no more sections of this course added for the semester.) It was argued that after all, the chairs will
have the best perspective on whether a given schedule can realistically be
implemented or not. Kurt Neumann moved a
resolution to underscore the crucial role of chairs and coordinators, the
importance of an amicable scheduling process in the best interests of students,
and the need to find a remedy for situations such as that in the English
Department. Andrew Wilson seconded the
motion. It was pointed out that the
Senate should have an opportunity to read the motion before acting on it, and
consequently Kurt withdrew the motion to give the Senate more time for consideration. Jim Edstrom will send copies of the original motion
to all Senators for their perusal.
Negotiations
were discussed. Names of faculty willing
to serve on the negotiations team and on related subcommittees are currently
being collected. The membership of the
negotiations team will be submitted to the Senate at the next meeting for their
consideration and approval. Some concern
was expressed over the need to share information with the faculty at large
concerning the process.
The
adjunct faculty contract was discussed.
Michael has asked Sue Overland to lead an effort to go over this
contract to determine its impact upon our contract. Sue asked for input from Senators.
Jim
reported on the appointments process.
All reappointments have been made and many of the new appointments have
been completed.
Linda
Campbell from the Academic Standards Committee reported that her committee
would like to know whether they should investigate the following issues:
1. How will online classes affect office hours?
2. Does an online class imply no face-to-face
contact with students?
It
was agreed that the committee should consider these issues.
Michael
noted that he has asked Paul Guymon to lead a group investigating how
reorganization of Academic Affairs will affect Faculty Senate
representation. It was suggested that
there be an all-faculty ballot on this issue.
We will discuss the problem at the next Senate meeting.
The
concern was expressed that reassigned time is under assault. The chairs and coordinators will discuss the
issue.
IX. Adjournment
The
meeting was adjourned at
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Edstrom