Harper College Faculty Senate

Professional … pragmatic … principled … progressive

 

Summary Minutes for December 1, 2005

(approved  January 19, 2006)

 

Executive Board:  Michael Harkins, President; Paul Guymon, Vice President; Jim Edstrom, Secretary; Dan Loprieno, Treasurer; Sue Overland, Grievance Officer; Julie Fleenor, Past President

 

 

I.                   Call to Order at 12:22 P.M.

 

II.                            President’s Report

·        Michael reminded everyone about the full-time faculty holiday party today and the all-campus holiday gathering sponsored by the Senate on Monday in A Building by the fireplace.  He noted that the Glenn Reich Award will be announced on January 12th at the all-faculty meeting.

·        The dean evaluations and the reorganization surveys are being processed.

·        He shared a couple of articles on the issue of shared governance.

·        He has received copies of the previous dean evaluations.

·        He spoke before the Board of Trustees at their last meeting, stressing the importance of working together.

·        He is appointing a forms committee consisting of Patti Ferguson, Caryn Levington and Jacque Mott.

·        The ad hoc committee on climate is continuing its work.

·        There will be a Faculty Senate luncheon during Orientation Week in the spring.

·        Michael thanked the Senators for all their hard work during this semester.

 

He then asked for a motion to go immediately to “New Business” on the agenda.  Jim Edstrom so moved; Pat Beach seconded.  The motion was approved.

 

VII.           New Business

Vice President of Academic Affairs Marge Skold noted that there has been a power outage in Buildings L and P.  Classes scheduled before 5:00 PM have been cancelled, and ComEd is currently working to restore power, which should be completed between 4:00 and 5:00 PM.

 

There was a discussion of the procedures for search committees.  There were questions about the ongoing hiring freeze for staff.  Marge noted that if there is a need for a position to be filled, a rationale for doing so must be submitted.

Several other points were discussed with regard to full-time faculty search committees:

 

1.         The Vice President of Academic Affairs asserted that deans serve on search committees, and it is her expectation that deans will participate in the hiring process.  Several Senators responded that the level of dean participation varies from division to division and department to department.

2.         The Vice President of Academic Affairs recommends but does not require small search committees of 3-5 members.  There are no mandates on either the size or the composition of the search committees.

3.         The Vice President of Academic Affairs recommends but does not require that committees include members from outside the department as well as from inside the department.

4.         The Vice President of Academic Affairs noted that The committee does not have to be diverse.  However, it is part of the College’s mission to encourage diversity in the candidate pool.

5.         Both the Senate and the Human Resources Committee have forcefully argued that the search process should result in the selection of one name to be forwarded for hiring.  The Vice President of Academic Affairs would like (but does not require) multiple names.

 

Some concern was expressed that a number of faculty positions have not even been posted yet.  Marge replied that this resulted from a mechanical glitch; on her way to catching an airplane flight, she sent a voicemail automatically to the deans to inform them as to which positions would be posted.  That message was not sent properly, and so there was a delay of about ten days before the error was discovered.  Marge was also asked whether the guidelines she is referring to are written down; she responded that they are the HR guidelines.  One Senator summed up the issue by asserting that we need to make sure that any new faculty are a comfortable fit and able to act as part of a team.

 

Vice President of Academic Affairs Marge Skold then left the meeting at 1:15 PM.  The Senate discussed what we had learned; there was still some confusion about the situation.  There was also some concern about the hiring freeze, with some wondering why there is a freeze when the College is actively hiring several new administrators.

 

With regard to the search committees, it was emphasized that there is a difference between recommendations and requirements.  Michael asked Senators to send Jim Edstrom their impressions of the meeting with Marge; Jim will work to compile them into one summary.  Kathi Nevels and Andrew Wilson volunteered to work with him on this project.

 

VIII.          Adjournment

Pat Beach moved for adjournment; Sue Bajt seconded.  The meeting was adjourned at 1:35 PM.

 

Respectfully submitted,

Jim Edstrom